Sign Up

Get the latest ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

All Romantic Suspense Coverage

Interview by

Two Union spies fall in love during a dangerous mission to thwart the Confederacy in our Romance Top Pick for April, An Extraordinary Union. Author Alyssa Cole has written a number of historical romances in other eras, but had determined to never set a novel in the Civil War. She talked to us about what made her change her mind, what it's like to switch between writing historical and contemporary romance and more! 

Describe your latest novel in one sentence.
A freed black woman with a photographic memory goes undercover as a slave in a Confederate senator’s home, where she meets a rakish fellow Union spy who grates her nerves, aides her cause and steals her heart. TL;DR version: Nevertheless, she persisted.

Because Elle has an eidetic memory, she frequently quotes or remembers passages from books she’s read. How did you pick out these quotations and determine which authors would be Elle’s favorites? Is there any overlap between what she enjoys and literature you like?
Although I do enjoy some of the literature Elle references, I looked through books that would have been available and/or popular during her lifetime, and searched for passages I thought would have resonated with the character. Because she remembers everything, there was a lot of material to work with!

You write in so many genres! Do you find there’s a difference in how you write depending on which genre you’re working in?
I think the biggest difference is, of course, the vocabulary and setting of the book, which I try to fit to the era in which the book is set. Sometimes when I’m bouncing between contemporary and historical, I’ll realize my contemporary characters are speaking like my historical characters, and then I have to recalibrate. I think no matter the subgenre, I try to focus on characters I find compelling and the romance that drives their stories.

You’ve written several other historical romances but had determined to not write a book set in the Civil War. What changed your mind?
Actually, and I had totally forgotten this, but An Extraordinary Union was the first historical romance I ever completed! I’ve always been a history buff and loved historical romance, but I had been resisting writing historicals because I didn’t want to deal with all of the horrible aspects of America’s past (this is a very typical American trait, you may have noticed). But I became a regular reader of Ta-Nehisi Coates’ blog at The Atlantic and fell in love with American history—particularly the untold stories.

In mid-2013, I had the idea to pull together an anthology of Revolutionary War romances featuring Americans whose stories are often neglected in history books, which eventually became For Love and Liberty (and my novella Be Not Afraid). I also wrote the first two chapters of a story that would eventually become my Civil Rights activist romance, Let It Shine. But I was definitely not going to set anything in the Civil War period . . . and then NaNoWriMo 2013 rolled around. The month before, I saw a call for a historical novella and 1960s America, the setting of Let It Shine, was beyond the cut-off point. Then I remembered Mary Bowser, the Civil War spy who Elle is based on, and “Definitely no Civil War” seemed a bit too hasty. Elle and Malcolm’s story took off from there.

Elle is an incredible heroine. What do you admire most about her?
I admire her bravery. One of the things that struck me the most in the accounts I read of Black-American Civil War spies was the bravery it must have taken to risk everything for a country that had done so wrong by them. Espionage and the situations it entails are harrowing, but I think it takes a special kind of bravery to believe fiercely in a country that has given you every reason not to.

Elle and Malcolm are both based on real historical figures. Where did you first hear about them and what about these people inspired you?
I’m pretty sure I first heard about Mary Bowser on Coates’ blog. I believe I came across Timothy Webster, who meshed well with the idea I already had for Malcolm, while researching Pinkertons. While Elle and Malcolm are fictional, the inspiration I drew from Mary and Timothy was their bravery, ingenuity and dedication to the American ideal.

You split your time between the Caribbean and NYC, and love to travel. What is your favorite place you’ve discovered recently?
Lately, because I live in the Caribbean for the most part, I’ve actually discovered some new places in America while visiting family and attending conventions. My most recent place that I really enjoyed was San Diego, which was warm and lovely. My impression of the city was probably aided by the fact that I rented an amazing tiny house while I was there!

What’s next for you?
Right now I’m finishing up Book 2 of The Loyal League series, A Hope Divided, which follows Malcolm’s brother Ewan. I’m also working on the second book of my Reluctant Royals series with Avon, which is launching in 2018. I’m really excited about this series, which is fun contemporary romance. And I’m also shining up my novella for Hamilton’s Battalion, an anthology I’m working on with Rose Lerner and Courtney Milan that will be out later this year.

ALSO IN BOOKPAGE: Read our review of An Extraordinary Union.

Author photo credit Katana Photography.

Two Union spies fall in love during a dangerous mission to thwart the Confederacy in our Romance Top Pick for April, An Extraordinary Union. Author Alyssa Cole has written a number of historical romances in other eras, but had determined to never set a novel in the Civil War. She talked to us about what made her change her mind, what it's like to switch between writing historical and contemporary romance, and more! 
Interview by

BookPage IcebreakerThis BookPage Icebreaker is sponsored by Thomas Nelson.


Indiana-based author Colleen Coble is the author of several bestselling Christian romantic suspense series, all set in unforgettable locations. But the Rock Harbor books, which began with her breakout novel, Without a Trace, might be her most beloved work. 

In Beneath Copper Falls, Coble's long-awaited return to the small town in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, Dana Newell tries to start over after fleeing an abusive relationship. Here, she reunites with series heroine Bree Matthews as Dana tentatively explores a relationship with a new friend, Boone. But there's a murderer on the loose who preys on vulnerable women—romancing them, proposing marriage and then murdering them. When Dana's ex-boyfriend follows her to Rock Harbor and begins threatening to destroy her new life, she and Bree will have to sort through Dana's past and the dangers of the present to unmask the killer.  

Bree has been the heroine in several of the Rock Harbor books—when did you make the decision to split the focus between her and Dana?
I made that flip before in a previous book, Abomination, that’s been re-released as Haven of Swans, and readers loved that. Because I write romantic mysteries, not that you can’t have romance with married characters, but you have to have a problem usually! So I decided to have Dana return to Rock Harbor, looking for help from Bree, and that worked out pretty well, I think. I think readers are going to enjoy Dana’s story, but they’re also going to get to see what’s going on with Bree, Kade and the kids.

Did you find yourself approaching chapters from Dana and Bree’s perspective differently? Was it useful to have two viewpoints?
One of the things I typically do when I’m writing is decide who has the most to lose, because that ups your stakes. I brought Bree in for the scenes where she’s really afraid for Dana, and I felt that really helped the reader realize just how much danger Dana is in. Sometimes it helps to have another perspective, and as Bree’s had some experience with dangerous people, she was able to carry that. And I was able to show their friendship and bring in the search dog angle that my readers love so well.

When did you first visit the Upper Peninsula and what was it that captured your attention and made you set a series there?
My husband and I love to vacation up there, so we knew about it before I wrote the series. When I read a magazine article about search and rescue in Yellowstone, I thought I wanted a wilderness area, but I wanted somewhere that isn’t as well known. Then all of a sudden I thought, “Oh, the UP!” I could have put it anywhere in the UP, but as I was researching I stumbled across the fact that the Keweenaw region was settled by Finns. My best friend in high school was a Finnish foreign exchange student, I’ve been to Finland, we hosted her daughter as a Finnish foreign exchange student—it was like it was meant to be. I was led to a perfect spot!

I always try to make sure that I go wherever I’m setting a series, because you never really know exactly what that culture is like and what it’s like in that area unless you are actually visiting there. So I hit small local cafes and coffee shops and just sit around, listen to people talk and try to immerse myself in that. And the UP is almost like stepping back in time. It’s a very low population and the people are lovely!

“I look around and there’s no justice in the world, but by golly, I can make sure it happens in my books!”

Have you done any of the ice-climbing and other outdoor activities the characters do in the series?
I have done some of that! Not the ice-climbing [laughs]. When I was writing the second book in the Rock Harbor series, Beyond a Doubt, I wanted to experience what a winter was like up there, so we went up in February. It was the coldest winter they had had in 10 or 15 years. It was unbelievably cold! My husband looked at me and said, “Maybe you ought to think about writing a series someplace warm next time” [laughs]. But it is really something up there. It is just an amazing wonderland during the winter.

Did you have to decompress after spending so much time writing from the perspective of a serial killer and a domestic abuser in Beneath Copper Falls? Does it get to you at all?
It doesn’t really get to me because I know they’re going to get their just desserts! People sometimes ask me, “Why do you write this stuff?” and I think it’s because I have a really strong sense of justice. I look around and there’s no justice in the world, but by golly, I can make sure it happens in my books!

Was the Groom Reaper, the serial murderer in Beneath Copper Falls, inspired by any real-life killers?
It really wasn’t. I got to thinking how to tie the hero to the heroine, by having his sister being previously killed. So then I got to thinking, “How would that play out?” I thought it was an intriguing premise, that these women never measure up [for the killer], and so he has to dispose of them and move on the next one. In fact, my critique partner, the romance writer Denise Hunter, came up with the name, which was just perfect!

You’re already balancing mystery and romance in your books. As a Christian writer, how do you mix in your faith while making sure all three elements are balanced?
You know, I have always said that it doesn’t matter who the writer is, you will always pick up their worldview. I could no more write a story that didn’t have a faith element than I could breathe, because that’s who I am. And so it comes out in the story in a very natural way. The thing is, it’s usually not planned. And early on in my career I would think, “OK, I’m going to have this spiritual element.” Well, my characters never obeyed or followed through with what I had planned! They always had their own issues that they were dealing with.

In my books, it’s not a salvation message usually. It’s more people like me, dealing with things I deal with. If I’m dealing with an issue with forgiveness, for example. Maybe there’s somebody I’ve had to come to grips with who doesn’t like me, and I’ve got to go through that. Or loss, or figuring out how I fit in the world. I never want to write a character who comes across as having it all together, because I sure don’t have it all together! In the first book, Without a Trace, Bree is searching for a plane that went down while carrying her husband and her little boy.  She’s dealing with a lot of guilt about what she could have done better, and whether it was her fault because [she and her husband had] had an argument. I deal with guilt sometimes, too, that I didn’t do enough or I don’t do enough. I think we as women deal with that in particular—we feel like we should be able to do it all, and the reality is, no one can.

And yes the romance has to balance in there too, along with the mystery. We did a survey about one or two years ago to see why readers pick up my books. It came out that they really loved the mystery and they loved the emotional relationship stuff going on. So I try to keep that balance. A lot of people who write romance have the hero and heroine hating one another. I’m not that way. My romance is more where they’re having to work together and they have some conflicts because of personalities and who they are, but they’re attracted to one another. I don’t write your traditional romance where you have a black moment and they’re going to break up. That’s just not my thing. I write more of a women’s fiction—relationships and how they can be broken and how they can be fixed.

Are there any books in the Rock Harbor series that you look back on now and see something that was going on your life that made it into the book without you realizing it?
Oh, yes. And that’s another thing that a lot of people have asked, whether I plot my books. And I don’t. I start off with an interesting premise, and I usually do not know who the villain is. I lay down rabbit trails and see where it and the characters take me. The character decides, and I know that sounds crazy [laughs]! “You’re the writer, don’t you know what your characters are going to do?” and by golly, I don’t! I’ll be writing along and those characters will go off in a direction I didn’t even know they knew how to do.

And so those themes that come out in the novel, I usually don’t know what direction they are going in. I start off with an interesting premise, and I see how it plays out in the character’s life. And they tell me the theme and the theme develops. When I reach the end of the novel, I see it, and then I can go back and strengthen that in the editing process.

So how does that work, not knowing who the villain is in the first draft? You must have to go back and fix or omit a lot of things in the subsequent drafts!
Exactly. And I’ve written a couple of books where I plotted it out. I tell you what, it was so not fun! Because I knew what was going to happen. If I knew what was going to happen, then why write the book? I might as well just forget it, because I want to be on a journey too!

There are so many plot elements to put together while writing a mystery. Does not knowing who the killer is in your first draft make the process easier for you? By not having that pressure to make it all fit together?
It does for me. But what I always tell aspiring writers, is that there’s no one right way to write. Everybody comes at a story differently. There are some people who must have it plotted out. They’re paralyzed and they can’t write it otherwise. My process is not like that. Anyone who says, “You must write this way,” turn around and walk away, because they don’t understand writing! We are not all wired the same, we just aren’t.

I found the character of Lori, who is younger and less settled in her life than the other characters, very interesting and sympathetic. You nailed how some people develop in fits and starts. Will we see her take center stage in a Rock Harbor novel eventually?
I do want to have her center stage. I’ve waited a while, because she’s still pretty young and my characters tend to be more in their late 20s. I almost did [write a book about] her this time, but I thought, “No, I’m going to wait one more book.” She’s always been a very interesting character to me. I’ve always loved her even when she was really a brat at the beginning of the series! But she’s progressed further than I even thought she was going to. She’s getting there! I think we all see ourselves in her a lot, because we all mess up.

Do you know what the premise of Lori’s story is going to be yet, or are you going to let it surprise you?
I don’t know yet, but it will definitely involve murder [laughs].

 

Author photo credit Amber Zimmerman, Clik Chick Photography.

Colleen Coble returns to her beloved Rock Harbor series with Beneath Copper Falls. Sponsored by Thomas Nelson.

Interview by

Monica McCarty is something of an expert in alpha males, given that she’s written an entire series starring medieval Scottish warriors. Her latest novel, Going Dark, takes the modern version of that archetype—a veteran Navy SEAL—and pairs him with a brilliant environmental activist. We talked to McCarty about writing a couple on opposite sides of the political spectrum, creating a cover to die for and the never-fading allure of Scotland. 

Describe your latest book in a sentence.
SEAL Team Six meets Rome’s Lost Legion.

This is your first contemporary book—what made you make the switch from historicals? And why contemporary suspense specifically?
I think, like most writers, I want to write the books I love to read. I’ve always read both historical and contemporary romance, and my favorite contemporary subgenre is suspense—especially with sexy military guys. I’m still planning to write more Scottish historical romances, but after completing a long series of 12 books (The Highland Guard), I was looking to do something a little different.

In terms of action and survival scenes, what was the biggest change from writing about a group of Highland soldiers to a group of Navy SEALS?
Not as much as you might think! These type of scenes always take a bit of research whether the technology and weaponry are 21st century or 14th century. It seems as if I’m always trying to figure out what they would have available to use either way.

The main characters in Going Dark disagree politically on a lot of subjects. That's not something I see a lot in literature, especially in romance, even though that is an issue a lot of couples have to deal with. What was your impetus for making that a key element of Dean and Annie’s relationship?
I think it’s not typical because it’s tricky to navigate without being preachy. I tried really hard to avoid that and to present both sides fairly without any kind of authorial slant. I was a lawyer so taking both sides is fun for me—I like to play the devil’s advocate! I also liked the challenge, particularly in today’s politically heated climate. I wanted to take some stereotypes and shake them up a little (bleeding heart liberal activist versus conservative military guy). I think it’s easy to put people in a category and jump to conclusions about how they think—I had fun playing with that. It also certainly provided lots of conflict! 

Who is your favorite couple in classic literature?
I hate to be unimaginative or predictable, but I love Darcy and Lizzie from Pride & Prejudice. A close second would be Farmer Gabriel Oak and Bathsheba from Thomas Hardy’s Far from the Madding Crowd.

What is it about Scotland and the Scottish culture that you think makes romance fans and authors gravitate to it so much?
I think it’s both familiar and accessible to American culture, yet different enough to make it interesting with the clans, tartans, great accents and the rich war-torn history that lends itself to great storytelling. For me, there was also the ancestral connection. My grandmother was Scottish. Some of the coolest emails and posts I received about my Highland Guard books were from descendants of people I wrote about—including Robert the Bruce! There is also a romantic element with the beautiful countryside, windswept moors and castles on rocky bluffs. And then there are those sexy guys in kilts. . . .

Going Dark has such a gorgeous cover, and you’ve said in prerelease materials that you were pretty hands-on in deciding what it would look like. What is the cover art process like for the author, and does your level of involvement change based on the book?
I was absolutely thrilled with how the cover came out. I was a little more involved with this one simply because it was the first book of a series, and we really wanted to get the feel of it right. Once the general look of the first cover is established, it’s usually easier for later books. For Going Dark, we discussed a general look at first, and then Berkley did all the hard work from there. I knew I wanted a guy on the cover, and that it was important that he reflect the guy in the pages. In other words, he had to be a hot, sexy badass! Which isn’t always as easy as it sounds, but the art department at Berkley came through with flying stars in that regard. I was thrilled with the model they picked. It was a rare case where the guy actually looked like the character I pictured. From there, it came down to poses. I loved the action shots because they felt a little different than the typical male-torso covers. But even though I’d seen the initial cover shot, I was amazed when they came back with the final cover. The Berkley cover gods worked some serious magic.

What is your favorite genre outside of romance?
I love nonfiction survival or adventure stories (think Jon Krakauer). I’m a sucker for anything about Mt. Everest, and one of my all-time favorite books is about recovering a lost treasure on a sunken ship (Ship of Gold in the Deep Blue Sea).

What’s next for you?
Right now I’m finishing up the second book in the Lost Platoon series, Off the Grid. It will be out next summer!

 

ALSO IN BOOKPAGE: Read our review of Going Dark.

Author photo by Alex Abercrombie.

Monica McCarty is something of an expert in alpha males, given that she's written an entire series starring medieval Scottish warriors. Her latest novel, Going Dark, takes the modern version of that archetype—a veteran Navy SEAL—and pairs him with a brilliant environmental activist. We talked to McCarty about writing a couple on opposite sides of the political spectrum, creating a cover to die for and the never-fading allure of Scotland. 

Interview by

Romantic suspense fans often list the tough, take-no-prisoners heroines of the genre as one of its biggest selling points, but Diana Muñoz Stewart takes things to an entirely new level. The first book in her new series, I Am Justice, introduces readers to the League of Warrior Women, a multicultural group of talented, ferocious women dedicated to combating misogyny and oppression. We talked to Stewart about flipping gender stereotypes, the most intimidating part about writing I Am Justice and which real-life activists inspire her.

What inspired you to create the League?
I had the idea for the League of Warrior Women after reading a series of disturbing articles about injustices against women. Specifically, I remember reading about María Santos Gorrostieta Salazar—a small-town mayor in Mexico who took on drug cartels and as a result was threatened and beaten, her husband was killed, and she herself was eventually killed. Her story and others I read made me wish for a group like the League—a superhero-like group of women, sisters, who travel the globe righting wrongs against women. Wherever society, misogyny or callous disregard let bad things happen to women, the League would be there.

One of my favorite aspects of Justices character is that she follows a lot of the tropes of the badass, snarky male action hero. Was that an intentional choice on your part?
I did consciously play with the classic perceptions of action heroes and gender roles. The female character is all guns blazing while the male hero, who is an ex-Special Forces soldier turned humanitarian, wants to help in more nurturing and caring ways. Though they can both handle themselves in an explosive situation, the male lead, Sandesh, started a charity to help those in need. And the female lead, Justice, is that angry, combative snarky action hero—hopefully with a little more depth. I think this about sums it up: “He’s done with war. She’s just getting started.”

How do you write action scenes that are compelling and not confusing?
This question makes me so happy. If you’re asking that, it means that I succeeded in doing something that I worked very hard at. When I first started writing action scenes, they were a bit too detailed. It slowed down the pacing with unnecessary description and emotion. I went from this abundance to paired-back scenes that my agent, the wonderful Michelle Grajkowski, kindly pointed out were too light on detail. So basically, it was through trial and error that I found, and continue to try and find, that sweet spot in writing action scenes.

There’s a debate throughout I Am Justice as to whether the Parish family and the League should stay predominantly female, or should accept more male members. Where do you stand in that debate?
Oh, good question! The thing I like about the Band of Sisters series is that it tackles this exact question—how men and women can work together to create positive change that benefits everyone. And since I’m not into excluding anyone, I like the idea of adding men. But the League is run by Mukta Parish, and she’s a bit of a hard-ass on the subject. Still, the answer to this question is more fully fleshed out in I Am Grace, the sequel to I Am Justice. I won’t be spoiling anything by saying that the League will always be comprised of mostly women, but as the group develops and finds more love interests willing to become part of the family, it’s inevitable that they add a few more men to the group.

What scared you the most about writing this book?
The idea that I might come off as flip or callous with the serious subject matter in the book. Walking the line between entertaining and speaking about and for people that aren’t always the heroes in books was daunting. There were days when I didn’t think I could pull it off, when the attempt felt silly and disrespectful. But I pushed past that mental barrier, that place where we tell ourselves all the reasons why we shouldn’t be doing something. And I hope the result was respectful and engaging.

What are your biggest pet peeves in romantic suspense?
Oh, man. I think anything can work if the writing is there to support it. I’ve seen out-of-the-box ideas with poor execution that end up feeling stale, and recycled ideas with great execution that sucked me in and carried me through a story. I will pretty much forgive an author anything as long as she or he doesn’t bore me.

Which real-life activists inspire you?
While doing research for I Am Justice, I came across so many incredible examples of women and men that are doing the hard work of changing the world, changing minds. I’m in the process of updating a list of linked organizations on my website, but here are a few of my favorites:

WomenOne
Equality Now
Camfed
PRAJWALA
GEMS
Save the Children
Dofeve

Who would you cast in a movie adaptation of I Am Justice?
I’m so bad at this. This is one of those situations where I’d like to use my lifeline. My phone-a-friend or ask-the-audience button. So if anyone out there has any ideas on who should be cast in I Am Justice, please let me know in the comments!

What’s next for you?
My next novel, I Am Grace, is finished and in production edits. I’m super excited about this novel. It brings together two dynamic characters, Gracie and Dusty. This novel takes on some difficult and timely topics—including sexual abuse and political power—while weaving together a steamy, opposites-attract love story.

 

ALSO IN BOOKPAGE: Read our review of I Am Justice.

Romantic suspense fans often list the tough, take-no-prisoners heroines of the genre as one of its biggest selling points, but Diana Muñoz Stewart takes things to an entirely new level. The first book in her new series, I Am Justice, introduces readers to the League of Warrior Women, a multicultural group of talented, ferocious women dedicated to combating misogyny and oppression. We talked to Stewart about flipping gender stereotypes, the most intimidating part about writing I Am Justice and which real-life activists inspire her.

Interview by

HelenKay Dimon must be one of the busiest people in romance. She won the RITA for Best Romantic Suspense at this year’s RWA convention, she just published The Protector, the last book in her Games People Play series, and she’s also president-elect of the RWA. We caught up with Dimon to talk about her goals as incoming president, the fate of the Golden Heart Contest and where the romance genre and community need to do better.

You just won a RITA for The Fixer! What was that moment like for you?
Unreal but fantastic. My category—romantic suspense—was so strong. My fellow finalist authors are really doing amazing work, writing great books. I spent the entire conference name-checking the other finalists, insisting they all deserved to win. I truly believed that and didn’t prepare a speech. I was sitting with friends, just enjoying the night, when my name was called. I’ve had time to reflect, and some of the shock has worn off, but I am still so grateful and honored. I loved writing The Fixer. I love working with my editor, May Chen, and with Avon. To have all of that come together in a RITA win is pretty amazing and special.

How do you think the diversity summit at this year’s RWA conference went? What new ideas or initiatives came out of it?
I’ll put on my President-Elect hat for this one. . . . In an effort to promote open and honest discussion during the Diversity Summit, RWA keeps the attendance to invitation-only and follows the Chatham House Rule. The Summit is an opportunity for industry professionals, members of the RWA Board, RWA’s Diversity Committee, authors in leadership roles and other individuals to come together to discuss inclusion. Those discussions lead to ideas that need time to be assessed, so I don’t have any initiatives to report right now from this year’s Summit, but a summary of the event will be released by RWA this week.

I also can report on an initiative that arose out of the 2017 Diversity Summit. In July, the RWA Board voted to fund up to two housing stipends for summer interns who are from traditionally marginalized groups to work in publishing houses with established romance publishing programs. The idea is to help offset the housing costs associated with living in places like New York City during an internship. With the stipend, publishing houses can look for interns outside of the usual local universities they recruit from to find interns. The stipend recognizes that representation is not just about authors. It’s about promoting diversity when it comes to the people in publishing with the power to acquire and work on books. It took a year to work out the feasibility of such a program and the details, but we are very excited about it.

There have been several high-profile books and authors over the last few years that seem to prove romance is changing for the better in terms of diversity and representation. But do you think books like The Kiss Quotient and An Extraordinary Union are representative of a more lasting change?
I would say all authors need to fight to make sure this is representative of lasting change. Diverse authors are talented and right there. They are not invisible. It’s time to end the thinking that publishing is only a career for people who look or love a certain way. For years the message has been that successful books by authors from traditionally marginalized groups were outliers. Their success was portrayed as something “special” and outside of the normal. The insulting message was then reinforced in cover art and by separating out books, especially those by black authors and LGBT+ romances, onto different shelves in bookstores. That was a huge disservice to authors, readers and the industry. My hope is that we are all more aware of the harm that outlier message sends, whether spoken or unspoken, and that the romance community can lead the way in doing better.

In May, RWA announced that it was reconsidering the Golden Heart Contest for unpublished manuscripts, and potentially ending it. Do you have any updates on that decision-making process you can share? And what led the organization to consider discontinuing the contest?
At the July meeting, the RWA Board voted to discontinue the Golden Heart after one final contest that will begin in fall 2018, with awards being given out at the conference in New York City in July 2019. The Golden Heart is an incredible and important part of RWA’s history. It helped to launch careers and bring unpublished authors together in invaluable support groups. It was also created when there was only one path to publishing—traditional publishing through New York publishing houses. As the industry changed, more people self-published and made other publishing choices, and fewer people were eligible for the contest. Over the last few years, different RWA Boards have made changes to try to highlight the contest and increase the benefits, but the number of people who entered continued to sharply decline. Decreasing interest, changes in the marketplace and the reality that the contest lost money every year for the last few years made continuing it impossible. One of the things I have promised the RWA Board members who will remain next year and the general RWA membership is that we will make figuring out what happens after the Golden Heart a priority.

If you could guarantee that one of your goals as incoming president would be accomplished, what would it be?
The RWA Board is made up of many talented, smart and dedicated members, so I don’t do anything on my own. I wouldn’t want to, because when the RWA Board is working at its best, it’s collaborative. I do have some power over the agenda and can say that my plan is to continue the forward momentum, working to ensure that RWA is open, meaningful and welcoming to all. That means honoring our commitment to our historically marginalized members and pushing to open as many doors as possible in publishing.

In light of industry changes, I believe RWA needs to re-evaluate what it offers all of its members—unpublished, traditionally published, self-published, hybrid published, those switching between groups and those trying to find their way back into publishing. That includes a need for discussions about programs and benefits, as well as making a commitment to figure out what comes after the Golden Heart Contest now that it is ending. We have a lot of work ahead of us, but my presidential year will be my sixth year on the RWA Board, and I’m hoping it will be the most productive one yet.

What is something you think romance writers and fans would be surprised to learn or don’t quite understand about how RWA functions?
Probably how much time, resources, planning and work goes on behind the scenes. RWA is lucky to have an extraordinary and dedicated staff that keeps everything running. As for the RWA Board, every decision is weighed, discussed and assessed. Change might take longer than people would like, but generally that’s because we’re dealing with approximately 10,000 members with 10,000 different careers and needs. It’s detailed and time-consuming work, but it should be. When we make a change, we don’t want to make the wrong one.

The romance community has really embraced self-publishing and eBooks. Why do you think the other literary genres are still holding out?
Romance tends to be on the forefront of changes in publishing. The genre is made up of so many smart business people. When they found it difficult to get the price of their books where they wanted, or to publish the type of books they wanted, they found a way to get the books into the hands of their dedicated fans. Maybe it’s because romance authors hear the “When will you write a real book?” nonsense all the time. We have thicker skin. We’re willing to take chances and not worry about what people outside the genre think. Honestly, I think other genres could take a lesson.

Suzanne Brockmann’s Lifetime Achievement Award speech this year basically lit Twitter on fire. While the reaction was largely positive, there was some criticism of her calls for greater diversity in romance and support of the Democratic Party in the midterm elections this fall. Why do you think there can be such a resistance to romance authors taking explicitly political stances, or even advocating for greater representation in their own genre?
This is me, speaking purely as an author and not as the President-Elect of RWA or on behalf of RWA, because this issue is very important to me on a personal level. For so long authors, not just romance authors, have been told not to be political online. The advice relates to branding and is about not upsetting some readers. I understand why the advice is out there, but it’s just not relevant or realistic in today’s world, to the extent it ever really was. The advice ignores the fact that writing romance is in many ways an inherently political act. Women in charge of their lives, finances, futures and sexuality? Unfortunately, that’s considered bold to some, but romance has been spreading that message for years. What we, as a community, have not been so great about is recognizing that some of our fellow members are hitting roadblocks due to ethnicity, disabilities, sexual preferences and other issues. I hope there is a greater awareness now and a better understanding that fighting for all romance authors is right and needed. I’m happy that people are standing up, that Suzanne Brockmann and Sonali Dev and other speakers issued a challenge for us to do better. I think we need to listen.

You’re about to publish The Protector, the fourth book in your Games People Play series. Will this be the final book? And what would you like to write in your next series?
The Protector
is the final book in the Games People Play series. I have loved writing about these couples and solving the cold case in each book. I am working on my new series, which will also be published by Avon starting in summer 2019. It’s a character-driven romantic suspense series set on a fictional island in Washington State where people go when they want to start over. I’m unraveling the first book right now and generally making the lives of the hero and heroine very difficult, which is the fun part.

What recent reads would you give a (metaphorical) presidential stamp of approval?
You might be sorry you asked. I literally could spend pages writing about the books I’ve recently bought and those I’ve already read and loved. To save some space, I’ll tell you about some of the romance authors I’m loving right now who I think you should try: Alyssa Cole, Jill Shalvis, Beverly Jenkins, Scarlett Cole, Jayne Ann Krentz (an all-time favorite), Rebekah Weatherspoon, Vivian Arend, Courtney Milan, Alisha Rai, Lauren Dane, Mia Sosa, Kit Rocha, Farrah Rochon, Alexis Hall, Sarah MacLean, Jackie Lau, Damon Suede, Reese Ryan, Priscilla Oliveras, Tessa Dare, Sonali Dev, Laura Griffin . . . should I keep going? But if you want book titles, the last two romances I read and recommend are The Kiss Quotient by Helen Hoang and The Naked Truth by Vi Keeland.

HelenKay Dimon must be one of the busiest people in romance. She won the RITA for Best Romantic Suspense at this year’s RWA convention, she just published The Protector, the last book in her Games People Play series, and she’s also president-elect of the RWA. We caught up with Dimon to talk about her goals as incoming president, the fate of the Golden Heart Contest and where the romance genre and community need to do better.

Interview by

To read one of Karen Rose’s romantic suspense novels is to enter an expansive, photo-realistic world. Each of her books is populated by a sprawling cast of law enforcement officials, their friends and family, and some truly twisted serial killers. Throughout series set in Chicago, Baltimore and Cincinnati (along with stops in Philadelphia, Atlanta and other major American cities), there are no stock side characters—everyone has a story to tell. With Say You’re Sorry, Rose kicks off a new series set in Sacramento, where an attack on radio personality Daisy Dawson reveals a killer that’s been operating for years, unnoticed by the police until now. We talked to Rose about creating her two complicated leads, why film noir inspires how she depicts violence and why she writes while listening to Barry Manilow.

What came first while you were plotting this novel? The cult or the serial killer?
The serial killer definitely came first. I got the idea for him at least five years ago while I was on a flight from Tampa to NYC. Sitting next to me was this man from Scandinavia. We got to chatting (as I do) and he shared he’d been an electrical engineer, but one day he stopped by the store after working very late and envied the woman behind the cash register because she didn’t take her work home. He changed his career, training to become a pilot. He flew for a service that was a mix between a charter and an airplane timeshare. He might be in Barcelona in the morning, Paris in the afternoon and New York the next day. He’d just delivered a plane to Tampa and was on his way home.

I stared at him and said, “If you were a serial killer, you’d never get caught. There would be no pattern.” He stared back, looking very concerned until I told him I was a thriller writer, LOL. I’ve been waiting for the right book to write this serial killer!

The cult came later, once I’d traveled several times to Northern California and realized how remote it is. Which is why so many cults have formed there.

Your previous series have been based in Baltimore and Cincinnati. What led you to pick Sacramento as the setting for your new series?
I have friends in Sacramento and have been able to visit them more often on my way to Northern California to meet with my writing group for plotting retreats. I’d set Taylor Dawson’s (heroine of Monster in the Closet) backstory in Northern California and decided to continue the Dawsons’ story in Sacramento with Daisy. My friends have been very helpful in showing me the city!

You’re known for writing series with a large cast of characters. How did you balance the central couple's love story, along with introducing the rest of the cast and developing the mystery in Say You’re Sorry?
I never know how to answer this. It just . . . happens. I see the story like I’m in a 360-degree movie theater. It’s happening all around me, parallel stories simultaneously, and I write what I see.

Speaking of the central couple, both Gideon and Daisy have complicated, emotionally fraught backstories. Why did you decide to give both of them such difficult pasts, and what was the most enjoyable aspect of writing two powerful, yet damaged protagonists?
My characters always have complicated, emotionally fraught backstories! I’m really mean that way ☺.

Seriously, to me the damaged characters are more interesting and catch my heart. The most enjoyable part is watching them grow and blossom and find their happily-ever-after. It’s so much more gratifying because they’ve earned it!

I found Daisy’s character to be quite layered, because I’d already told the Dawson family’s backstory in Monster in the Closet. But Daisy’s perspective of the same events is so different. I’m fascinated at how two people can grow up in the same home and be impacted so very differently.

Gideon, despite his harsh upbringing, was still kind and capable of tenderness. He’s not as alpha as some of my other heroes, but he’s still strong. He reminded me of Gregory Peck’s character in The Big Country—quietly solid. They’re different people, Daisy and Gideon, yet they have a mutual respect for each other and I loved that.

Say You’re Sorry does an admirable job depicting violence in a sensitive and non-gratuitous way, as well as portraying its serial killer in a three-dimensional light while never losing sight of the horror of his crimes. Has your approach to depicting violence and the perpetrators of it in your novels changed over the course of your career?
Thank you! I don’t think it’s changed that much. I learned a lot from watching the old film noir movies. You don’t see a lot of blood or gore in these films. What you do see is the reactions of the witnesses and victims to what’s happened. That is often scarier because it puts the viewer—or reader in the case of my books—in the place of the victim. We feel their terror, desperation and loss. Adding the POV of the killer increases the terror because we as the reader know what he’s planning—and what he’s capable of doing.

Violence happens every day and doesn’t need to be gratuitous on the page. We see enough of that in the real-world news. Reading about it in detail degrades the victims. Allowing the reader to emotionally connect with the victim is far more powerful.

How do you decompress from writing the darker material in your novels?
I read voraciously, but I don’t read thrillers as a rule. My decompression diet is contemporary romance of all kinds and comedy films. I have very lowbrow taste in movies. Talladega Nights is my go-to decompression flick ☺.

What are your pet peeves as a reader of mystery & suspense?
I hate, hate, hate when the story just ends. The author’s got a great setup and has me all worked up and then, the book just . . . ends. It’s all wrapped up in a few paragraphs of explanation way too soon. Like they ran out of time or pages. I feel cheated.

I also hate when the bad guy is the most obvious suspect, but nobody suspects him. And when the story doesn’t make sense or requires I take a leap of faith across the Grand Canyon. I clearly have feelings on this subject. LOL.

You love Barry Manilow, but many of your villains have murdered people to his music—does this ruin it a bit for you?
Well, to be fair, only one villain heard the music as he murdered. The rest don’t realize that I’m hearing Manilow’s music while they’re busy being villainous. I love Manilow because his voice is so smooth. It allows me to capture a mood and nothing rips me out of it. Which is why I had to remove “Copacabana” from my playlist—I kept getting ripped from the story and dancing in my chair. And maybe having “I Can’t Smile Without You” playing in the background keeps me from getting sucked too deep into the darkness. Or maybe it simply means I’m twisted ☺. So, nope, it doesn’t bother me at all!

What’s next for you?
I’m currently writing book five in my Cincinnati series, with Diesel and Dani as the central couple. Folks have been waiting for their story for some time, so it has to be good. No pressure, right?

After that book is finished, I’ll be returning to Sacramento for book two—Rafe and Mercy’s story. And I have a few books planned after that, so I’ll be busy!

 

ALSO IN BOOKPAGE: Read our review of Say Youre Sorry.

Author photo by Brian Friedman Photography.

We talked to Say You're Sorry author Karen Rose about creating her two complicated leads, why film noir inspires how she depicts violence and why she writes while listening to Barry Manilow.

Sign Up

Stay on top of new releases: Sign up for our newsletter to receive reading recommendations in your favorite genres.

Recent Reviews

Author Interviews

Recent Features