If you follow authors on Twitter, chances are you know all about the Jennifer Weiner-Jodi Picoult-Jonathan Franzen literary vs. commercial fiction showdown taking place online.
Well, I suppose “literary vs. commercial fiction showdown” isn’t entirely appropriate. Weiner explains the issue on her blog:
[Franzen's] back! On the cover of Time! In the pages of Vogue! Reviewed, glowingly, not once but twice in the New York Times! Which has also devoted a news story and an inside-the-list column to FREEDOM, even though it won’t come out ‘til next week!
Jodi Picoult, number-one bestseller of quote-unquote commercial fiction (full disclosure: she and I attended the same college and are published by the same house), has a problem with that. Last week, she tweeted about all of the attention the Times gives to its white male literary darlings, at the expense of the hundreds of thousands of other writers – some of them literary, some of them quote-unquote genre writers – who get no love at all.
Not surprisingly (I’m biased!), my first response is that you should all just forget the New York Times and read BookPage, which has interviewed Weiner, Picoult and Franzen (twice each) in the past 10 years.
But if you do want to get up-to-speed on the drama, here are few notable links:
- Book critic Chauncey Mabe suggests in the Sun-Sentinel that Picoult and Weiner made a choice to write commercial books, and their “punishment is to be rich, famous, and disregarded by The New York Times.”
- Chris Jackson blogs on The Atlantic‘s site about choosing to read more books written by women.
Do you think there’s a critical bias against women’s fiction? Do you take issue with that label? (Or the controversial “check lit” distinction?) Do you think this whole dust-up is silly?
As someone who reads both literary and commercial fiction (as do most readers of this blog, I’d imagine), I haven’t gotten too bent out of shape over this dispute. I’m just happy it inspired the hilarious @EmperorFranzen twitter page!
Also in BookPage:
Interviews with Weiner about Goodnight Nobody and Best Friends Forever.
Interviews with Picoult about Change of Heart and The Tenth Circle.
Interview with Franzen about The Corrections. (I’ll post our interview about Freedom on August 31, the novel’s publication date.)




I love that Linda Holmes said the term “chick lit” made her feel like a marshmallow peep. That is the perfect description. Jodi Picoult writes solid, intriguing fiction which speaks to current issues around us. Thanks for the story.
As a librarian, I have trouble with the distinction of literary vs. commercial. Does this mean that THE HELP by Kathryn Stockett was literary until it became popular and the media started talking about it? Does a book lose its literary merit by becoming widely read? What about THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO by Stieg Larsson? According to the news, it is the most widely read book at present. Is that from all the media coverage it has received? I think not. Most of the library patrons who ask me for the book tell me that they heard about it from a friend. That is how I first heard of it, by word of mouth. Though popular, I still think it is well-written! So the question remains, can a popular book be literary?
The hoowaah around FREEDOM was a bit excessive.. if not a LOT.
Read what the Excerpt Reader had to say about Jonathan Franzen’s new Novel
http://the-excerpt-reader.blogspot.com/2010/07/excerpt-jonathan-franzens-freedom.html
Picoult makes valid points, but she is wrong about Jane Austen, as I’ve just blogged about on the Huffington Post. Jane Austen was not a popular novelist: http://tiny.cc/ee8ob